Henry
(Michael Scheider), a young immigrant, arrives to New York in 1910 with nothing
but his film camera and his dreams. He finds a career opportunity very quickly
presented by the producer George Spencer (James Sheehy). The job comes with a
reward, an aspiring actress Evelyn Spencer (Emily Kratter), the younger sister
of the producer. The poor thing appears to be not very talented but genuine and
sweet, and she quickly falls in love with Henry.
George
Spencer couldn’t be happier for his sister and his kinescope enterprise. To
seal the deal on both forefronts he makes the young cameraman marry his sister.
But as the law of drama dictates, the lovers can’t be happy because Henry falls
in love with a factory girl (Shira Averbuch), who in turn dreams of a career as
a showgirl.
photo by Pavel Antonov
The
setting is very charming; every New Yorker’s heart melts a little when they
hear immigrant stories of the early twentieth century. And even if their
ancestors didn’t start a new life by way of Elis Island, the romantic and
dramatic gaze of it penetrated the city’s culture deeply. What a rich and
fruitful setting for a musical. Paired with wonderful music and lyrics by Paul
Carbonara and Randy Sharp, the show was promised to be a success. And yet it
left very mixed feelings.
The
director Randy Sharp, perhaps, decided to compensate for the virtually
non-existing set with busy choreography. All eight performers are on stage all
the time, even during the solo numbers. The problem is that they are constantly
doing some movements with their hands, mostly adjusting clothes, even when they
are in the background. It seemed like a collective neurosis but it came across
as the director’s fear of emptiness and stillness. But there was more to it.
It
took me some time to see a pattern in every performer’s actions. They were in
fact sequences of movements, which each actor was repeating like a part of
clockwork. Taking into account the theme of the piece – movies and film
cameras, the concept seems very appropriate and smart. The cast worked as one
mechanism of a machine, with every piece of it responsible for its own task.
Some
of the choreographed sequences involved multiple people, which made for
beautiful pantomime scenes. For example, the making of a marital agreement, which
showed a dynamic between the trio of Henry-George-Evelyn. Within each new loop
the expressions on the faces of the actors changed, demonstrating escalating
concerns, disappointment and suspicions.
Unfortunately
this choreographic finding was overdone which made for a lot of distracting
background action and unnecessary stirring especially when adjusting clothes.
Luckily, the costumes designed by Karl Ruckdeschel were gorgeous, rich with
detail and texture, yet almost monochrome so I didn’t mind looking at those
skirts and blouses from inside and out, again and again.
Even
though the busy choreography was over the top, I would take it any day of the
week over theatrical clichés, especially with the delightful cast of young and
talented actors. I want to especially acknowledge the two female leads – Emily
Kratter (Evelyn) and Shira Averbuch (Louise) for their subtle yet expressive
performances.
Evening – 1910 performs at Axis Theatre at
One Sheridan Square, New York until May 28th.
Information on the performance schedule and tickets here: http://www.axiscompany.org/mainstage.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment